OANDA Review 2026 for India
OANDA review for India covering global regulation, RBI forex rules, OANDA login security, platforms and regulatory history.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:FXDD, a prominent forex broker, has recently sparked widespread concern among its users due to reported difficulties in withdrawals. Many customers have voiced complaints alleging their inability to withdraw funds from the platform. This issue has escalated further with the recent circulation of an email to users, purportedly from FXDD, announcing a change in leadership.

FXDD, a prominent forex broker, has recently sparked widespread concern among its users due to reported difficulties in withdrawals. Many customers have voiced complaints alleging their inability to withdraw funds from the platform. This issue has escalated further with the recent circulation of an email to users, purportedly from FXDD, announcing a change in leadership.
According to the email, FXDD's founder, Emil Assentato, has transferred ownership of FXDD Trading SAC to a new entity, 888 Markets Group (Co. 13397886). This group, described as a consortium of UK-based companies, aims to uphold and continue FXDD's legacy of success. However, scrutiny reveals that 888 Markets Group holds a low rating of 1.49/10 on WikiFX, a platform that rates forex brokers based on user experiences and regulatory status. Importantly, WikiFX notes that 888 Markets Group operates without regulatory licenses, labeling it as a high-risk platform.

Critics and concerned users have questioned the authenticity of FXDD's email, suggesting it may serve as a convenient excuse to delay or deny user withdrawal requests. WikiFX has issued a cautionary statement advising users to remain vigilant and exercise caution when dealing with 888 Markets Group.
The controversy surrounding FXDD highlights the challenges faced by investors in the forex industry, emphasizing the importance of thorough due diligence and regulatory compliance when choosing a brokerage. As developments unfold, stakeholders await further clarification from FXDD regarding the implications of this ownership transfer and its impact on user funds and operations.
Warning! 888 Markets official website is not available. This is a red flag for traders.

About FXDD

FXDD Trading offers a range of market instruments, including forex pairs, metals, energies, indices, cryptocurrencies, and stocks, providing traders with diverse trading opportunities. The platform offers two account types: Standard Account, which provides low spreads with no commissions, and ECN Account, which offers ultra-low spreads but involves small commission costs.
However, one significant drawback of FXDD Trading is the lack of regulatory assurance, which may raise concerns for potential traders. WikiFX has given this broker a low score of 2.09/10.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

OANDA review for India covering global regulation, RBI forex rules, OANDA login security, platforms and regulatory history.

This TPFx review examines PT Trijaya Pratama Futures, Broker Code 4461810512, its Bappebti record, the Q1 2026 A+++ assessment, look-alike website warning, product costs, withdrawals and complaint route for traders researching an Indonesia forex broker.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.