Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:A Batu Pahat housewife lost RM239,000 after being lured into a fake online investment scheme that displayed fabricated profits of RM663,000.

A housewife in Batu Pahat has lost RM239,000 to a fabricated investment scheme, a case that highlights how quickly online financial scams can escalate and how easily everyday investors can be drawn into sophisticated digital traps.
The victim, a 35-year-old Chinese national, was first contacted by an unknown individual in late October last year. What began as a casual online approach soon developed into detailed investment discussions conducted entirely through WhatsApp. Police said the suspect presented the scheme as a rare opportunity, emphasising high and rapid returns that appeared both convincing and attainable.
Investigators noted that the fraud followed a familiar but effective pattern. Trust was built gradually, with reassurances designed to lower the victims defences. The absence of face-to-face interaction did little to slow the process, reflecting how modern scams rely on constant online communication to create a sense of legitimacy and urgency.
Between mid-December and late January, the victim transferred money in stages to five separate bank accounts. The transactions, spread over several weeks, totalled RM239,000. Such staggered payments are often used to make the scheme appear routine and to prevent victims from realising the scale of their losses until it is too late.
To maintain control over the situation, the perpetrators provided access to an investment application displaying steady and dramatic growth. The app showed profits exceeding RM663,000, a figure designed to trigger excitement and reinforce the belief that the investment was succeeding. Authorities believe these figures were entirely fabricated, serving only to keep the victim engaged and compliant.
The turning point came when the woman attempted to withdraw her apparent gains. Instead of receiving funds, she was told that additional payments were required to unlock the profits. These demands, commonly disguised as processing or release fees, are a critical warning sign of fraud. The victim refused to make further transfers, at which point communication broke down.
Realising that the profits existed only on screen, she reported the matter to the police. The case is now being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which addresses cheating and dishonest inducement. Investigators are tracing the flow of funds and examining the bank accounts used in the scheme.
Under no circumstances should you engage with an investment scheme advertised on social media that promises high returns or sounds too good to be true without exercising caution. If in doubt, download the free WikiFX mobile application from Google Play or the App Store. This global broker regulatory query platform, at your fingertips, provides detailed information about brokers, including their regulatory status, customer reviews, and safety ratings. It allows users to verify the legitimacy of investment platforms before committing their money. With access to in-depth insights and risk alerts, WikiFX equips potential investors with the tools to make informed decisions and steer clear of unauthorised or unlicensed entities. By using WikiFX, users can safeguard their savings and avoid the costly traps of fraudulent investment syndicates.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.